{"id":3619,"date":"2026-04-22T11:59:50","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T03:59:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/?p=3619"},"modified":"2026-04-22T11:59:53","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T03:59:53","slug":"what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/blog\/2026\/04\/22\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\/","title":{"rendered":"What the Flower Industry Owes Mother’s Day"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

For more than a century, florists have profited enormously from a holiday whose founder died penniless fighting them. A growing movement within the trade is finally asking whether that arrangement needs to change.<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

The woman who invented Mother’s Day died in a sanitarium in 1948, penniless and furious. Anna Jarvis had spent the final thirty years of her life waging an increasingly desperate campaign against the holiday she had spent the preceding thirty years creating \u2014 filing lawsuits, staging protests, petitioning Congress, and haranguing anyone who would listen about what commercialisation had done to her idea. She had wanted a day of personal, private sentiment: a letter written by hand, a visit made in person, a quiet acknowledgment that the work of mothers had value beyond what the market assigned to it. What she got instead was a $35 billion annual retail event, with flowers ranking among the top three gifts purchased, and her own image used in advertisements for products she would have found contemptible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The darkly plausible legend \u2014 never definitively proved but never definitively refuted \u2014 is that a portion of the medical bills that kept her alive in that sanitarium were paid by the floral and greeting card industries she had devoted her final years to denouncing. The woman who created Mother’s Day, in other words, may have been kept alive long enough to keep fighting it by the very people she was fighting. It is the kind of story that, if a novelist invented it, would be edited out for being too on-the-nose.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is beyond dispute is this: when Jarvis died, she was childless, and the bills were unpaid, and the holiday was thriving. It has continued to thrive. The floral industry’s relationship to Mother’s Day has always been essentially extractive \u2014 it takes the emotional gravity of the occasion, converts it into purchasing urgency, and packages the result in cellophane. For most of the twentieth century, this arrangement was never seriously questioned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Something, however, is beginning to shift. In florists from London to Singapore, from Washington to Melbourne, a growing number of people who sell flowers for a living are asking a question the industry has long preferred not to raise: what does it actually mean to be mindful of the people you are marketing to? The answers they are arriving at \u2014 through opt-out email campaigns, sustainable sourcing commitments, expanded definitions of motherhood, and the quiet stocking of forget-me-nots alongside roses \u2014 amount, in aggregate, to a challenge to the industry’s foundational assumptions. Whether that challenge can survive contact with the commercial pressures of peak season is a question this industry has never had to seriously consider before. It is beginning to consider it now.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

I. The Holiday Nobody Chose<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

To understand why mindful marketing in the floral space matters, you first have to understand what Mother’s Day marketing has historically been doing \u2014 and to whom it has been doing it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The industry has always understood Mother’s Day as a logistics problem. There is enormous latent demand for flowers on the second Sunday of May; the task is to convert that demand into orders efficiently and at scale. Email sequences are armed weeks in advance. Subject lines are A\/B tested for maximum open rates. The promotional calendar is structured to create a crescendo of urgency \u2014 from “treat her early” in late April through “last chance” on the Saturday before \u2014 designed to capture every category of procrastinator, which is to say most customers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What this approach does not account for \u2014 what it has structurally no mechanism for accounting for \u2014 is the significant portion of the population for whom the second Sunday in May arrives as something other than an opportunity for celebration. Bereavement researchers have long understood that grief does not observe a linear timeline; the person who lost her mother six years ago may find year seven harder than year two, triggered by something as apparently innocuous as a promotional email with a pink carnation in the header. The infertile woman who has spent three years in fertility treatment does not experience Mother’s Day as a commercial event. The person estranged from an abusive mother for reasons that required years of therapy to work through does not respond to “spoil her \u2014 she deserves the best” in the way the copywriter intended. The grandmother who has been raising her grandchildren since her daughter became unable to does not always recognise herself in the industry’s standard imagery of a middle-aged woman receiving roses from a smiling child.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These are not edge cases. By any reasonable demographic accounting, the population of people for whom Mother’s Day is uncomplicated \u2014 who have a living mother with whom their relationship is warm, who have not experienced pregnancy loss, who have not struggled with infertility, who do not fall outside the narrow family structures the industry’s visual language depicts \u2014 is significantly smaller than the industry’s marketing approach assumes. One analysis found that 84 percent of U.S. adults plan to celebrate Mother’s Day. It did not ask, and such analyses rarely do, what celebrating means when the person you are celebrating is gone, or was never there in the way the holiday imagines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The marketing approach has, therefore, always contained an implicit claim about its audience \u2014 a claim that most customers are in a straightforward, uncomplicated celebratory relationship with the holiday \u2014 that turns out, on examination, to be substantially incorrect. And the cost of that incorrectness is not borne evenly. It is borne, disproportionately and silently, by the people who receive promotional emails they did not want, who walk into florists decorated with imagery that excludes them, who are asked by well-meaning staff what they are getting for their mom.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What the mindful marketing movement is really arguing, at its core, is that this implicit claim should be retired. That the industry’s model of its customer needs to expand. That the flowers will still be sold \u2014 more of them, in fact, to a wider range of people \u2014 if the assumption of universal, uncomplicated celebration is replaced by something more honest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

II. The Email That Became a Movement<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The clearest demonstration of the business case for this argument arrived in March 2019, from an unexpected source. Bloom & Wild, a UK-based online florist, sent a short email to its entire customer list before Mother’s Day. The email acknowledged that the holiday could be difficult for some people, and offered a simple opt-out: customers who preferred not to receive any Mother’s Day marketing could click a link, and the company would remove them from those communications entirely. No explanation required. No penalty to their account. No condescending inquiry into their reasons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The person who wrote the email, a copywriter named Lucy, described her thinking plainly: the previous year, many customers had written in asking to be removed from Mother’s Day marketing because they found it too difficult, so giving everyone the option seemed self-evidently correct. The reasoning was not sophisticated. The gesture it produced was.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What happened next is now a minor legend in marketing circles. Almost 18,000 Bloom & Wild customers opted out of the Mother’s Day campaigns. This number, which might have alarmed a different kind of company, was not a loss. Bloom & Wild’s interactions on Twitter quadrupled the day the campaign launched. The company’s inbox filled with letters \u2014 from bereaved people, from those in infertility treatment, from people whose relationships with their mothers were complicated in ways they had never expected a flower company to acknowledge. The letters shared a common theme, phrased in many different ways: thank you for seeing us.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The business logic proved sound for reasons that should have been obvious in advance but apparently weren’t. The opt-out campaign did not reduce sales; it built the kind of loyalty that is resistant to competitive pressure, the kind generated when a company demonstrates that it understands something about its customers that most companies don’t bother to find out. Bloom & Wild’s co-founder and chief executive, Aron Gelbard, articulated what the campaign had been trying to do: put customers first, even when \u2014 especially when \u2014 doing so meant acknowledging that not all of them were in a position to celebrate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company formalised the approach. In 2020, it launched the Thoughtful Marketing Movement, inviting other brands to commit to offering opt-outs from potentially distressing holiday communications. The restaurant chain Wagamama was among the first to sign up. Others followed. Over 100 brands eventually joined. The following year, Bloom & Wild extended the opt-out beyond email: customers who chose not to see Mother’s Day content would find no mention of it anywhere on the website when logged in \u2014 not on the homepage, not in the navigation, not on product pages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The reach of the idea extended to parliament. Matt Warman, a Conservative MP who had been orphaned at twenty-seven, raised the issue in the Commons, describing the “dread” with which many bereaved people approached promotional seasons. He called for a voluntary code among advertisers \u2014 citing Bloom & Wild as a model of what responsible behaviour looked like. Australia followed. A growing roster of Australian brands began offering opt-outs, citing the Bloom & Wild precedent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What had happened, underneath the feel-good coverage and the industry awards, was something structurally significant. A florist had treated the concept of customer care not as a slogan but as a design constraint \u2014 had asked, before building its marketing system, what happens to the people this system might harm, and had built around the answer. That this was remarkable enough to generate parliamentary debate and international imitation is itself a commentary on how low the baseline was.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

III. The Cartography of Pain<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

To make the opt-out argument fully, it helps to map the emotional territory that surrounds Mother’s Day with some precision \u2014 to understand not just that the holiday is painful for some people, but who those people are, why, and in what ways the industry’s standard approach fails them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Start with bereavement, which is the most legible form of grief but also the most easily misunderstood by marketers. The common assumption is that the recently bereaved are the relevant population \u2014 that if a person’s mother died in the last year or two, they might need a little consideration, but that grief otherwise resolves on a predictable schedule. This is not how grief works. The relationship between loss and time is nonlinear and highly individual; many people find that grief intensifies rather than diminishes at the one- or two-year mark, as the initial support structures withdraw and the permanence of the loss becomes undeniable. The argument for changing marketing language \u2014 shifting from “celebrate Mom” to “honor Mom,” for example \u2014 rests precisely on this insight: “celebrate” implies a present person; “honor” does not. It is a small word and a significant difference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The case of infertility is less visible but, demographically, substantial. Approximately one in six couples experience fertility problems by some measures. For those in active treatment, or those who have concluded treatment without the outcome they wanted, or those still in the hoping-month-after-month phase that precedes any formal diagnosis \u2014 the annual saturation of the cultural environment with flowers and tributes and brunch reservations and targeted advertisements can constitute something close to harassment. The specific cruelty is not intentional; it is structural. Nobody decided to make Mother’s Day painful for infertile people. The holiday is simply optimised for a particular kind of person, and people who don’t fit the optimisation pay the cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Miscarriage introduces another register of loss entirely. It is the most common pregnancy complication, affecting roughly one in four pregnancies, and it is also among the least acknowledged in public life. The organisation Evermore Blooms, founded in the United States after its founder received an anonymous bouquet on the two-year anniversary of her first miscarriage, has built an entire non-profit infrastructure around this gap \u2014 sending flowers to mothers of miscarriage on the anniversary of their loss, or on what would have been the baby’s due date, in partnership with local florists who often provide their services at cost or for free. The impulse behind the organisation is not complicated. These are dates that a mother never forgets, but when they come around, her initial support system has faded or unintentionally forgotten. Flowers, in this context, function not as celebration but as witness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beyond these forms of grief, there are the structural exclusions that the industry’s visual language has historically built in by default. The same-sex couple who both identify as mothers, and who find themselves represented, if at all, as a novelty rather than a norm. The transgender woman who is a mother but whose experience of motherhood has rarely, if ever, appeared in mainstream floral advertising. The grandmother who has been the primary caregiver for years but who the industry consistently depicts as a secondary figure, someone to be honoured in addition to, rather than instead of, a mother who may or may not be present. The father who raised his children alone. The older sibling who stepped up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The industry’s standard response to this list has been a kind of benign inattention \u2014 not hostility to any of these people, but a failure to design marketing with them in mind. The mindful marketing argument is not that this failure was malicious. It is that it was expensive \u2014 to customers who felt unseen, and ultimately to businesses whose audiences were narrower than they needed to be.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

IV. The Semantics of Care<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

There is a version of this conversation that stays at the level of language \u2014 that concerns itself primarily with the words florists use and the photographs they select, and does not reach deeper than that. This version has genuine value, but it is also easily coopted. A company can swap “Mum” for “the special women in your life” in its email subject line and change nothing material about how it treats customers who don’t fit the standard template.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The more interesting version goes further, and it is the version that the most thoughtful florists are actually practicing. Walk into a forward-thinking floral studio today and the difference from the industry standard is not just in the signage \u2014 though the signage has changed, from “She Deserves the Best” to things like “For everyone who has nurtured you” \u2014 but in the texture of the entire customer experience. Staff have been trained to avoid assumptions: not “What are you getting for your mom?” but “Who are you celebrating today?” or simply “How can I help you?” The shift in question, from a closed presupposition to an open invitation, is not cosmetic. It represents a genuinely different theory of the customer \u2014 one that does not pre-assign them to a demographic category before they have had a chance to tell you why they came in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The term “chosen family” has entered the marketing vocabulary of the more progressive end of the industry, and it is worth pausing on what it signifies. For large portions of the population \u2014 LGBTQ+ communities, people estranged from biological relatives, people who have built networks of care in the absence of traditional family structures \u2014 the people who have functioned as mothers may have no legal or biological relationship to them whatsoever. A neighbour who checked on them daily when no one else did. A teacher who saw something in them and refused to stop seeing it. An older friend who gave advice and made meals and showed up, consistently, over years. These relationships are not lesser than biological ones; they are sometimes more sustaining than biological ones. The florist whose marketing acknowledges them has both done right by its customers and, incidentally, enlarged the pool of people who feel addressed by its products.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This expansion of definition is not merely rhetorical. Some florists have begun restructuring their Mother’s Day product lines around it \u2014 offering, rather than a monolithic “Mother’s Day Collection,” a range of arrangements explicitly named for different kinds of care: the Nurturer, the Teacher, the Grandmother, the Mentor. Customers who have been primarily raised by someone other than a biological mother \u2014 and who may have spent years feeling slightly outside the mainstream of the holiday \u2014 find themselves explicitly included. Anecdotally, these florists report that the reframe does not contract their market; it expands it. The people who were always going to buy flowers for their mothers still do. The people who previously felt the holiday was not quite for them start buying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The staff-training dimension of this is underappreciated. An inclusive product line and a sensitively worded email campaign can be undone in thirty seconds by a well-intentioned front-of-house employee who asks the wrong question. Forward-thinking florists are investing in the kind of customer service training that treats empathy not as a personality trait some employees happen to have but as a learnable professional skill \u2014 one that can be taught through role-play, scenario planning, and explicit discussion of the holiday’s emotional range. For customers purchasing memorial or remembrance flowers, this means handling orders with care and discretion: not asking unnecessary questions, not conducting a front-of-house conversation about the details of an arrangement intended for a deceased parent, and creating a quiet, low-friction path to completing a purchase that carries grief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

V. The Environmental Reckoning<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The conversation about whom the floral industry is failing emotionally exists alongside, and is related to, a conversation about whom and what it is failing ecologically. The connection between these two conversations is not coincidental. Both are fundamentally about the same thing: the gap between the industry’s self-presentation as a purveyor of beauty and care, and the actual costs \u2014 human, environmental, social \u2014 that its supply chain generates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those costs are significant. Nearly 80 percent of cut flowers sold in the United States are imported, the overwhelming majority from a small number of growing regions: Colombia, Ecuador, Kenya, Ethiopia. The flowers travel by air freight \u2014 among the most carbon-intensive modes of transport available \u2014 in refrigerated holds, to distribution centers, and onward to shops and doorsteps. The environmental cost of a dozen roses delivered to a British home for Mother’s Day is, by most calculations, substantially larger than its price suggests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The social dimensions of this supply chain are similarly uncomfortable. Labor conditions at large-scale cut flower farms in the Global South have been the subject of sustained criticism for decades. The same pesticide regimes that produce unblemished blooms at scale have contaminated local waterways and caused documented health problems among farmworkers who apply them without adequate protection. Fair-trade and sustainably certified flowers exist, and some florists source exclusively from such farms, but certification schemes vary in rigor and the market penetration of genuinely ethical supply chains remains limited.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Into this picture arrived the Slow Flowers movement, founded by the Seattle-based writer and advocate Debra Prinzing, who drew an explicit analogy to the Slow Food movement that had been reshaping the food industry for a generation. The philosophy is captured in a slogan \u2014 “Grown not flown” \u2014 that makes the environmental argument with maximum economy. The Slow Flowers Society launched a directory in 2014, just before Mother’s Day, listing florists and farms committed to local, seasonal, and sustainable sourcing. A decade later, it has nearly 700 members.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The practical implications of the slow flowers philosophy are more interesting than the name suggests, because they require accepting a kind of scarcity and seasonality that the industrialised flower market has spent decades engineering away. When you commit to locally grown flowers, you commit to growing seasons. In the mid-Atlantic in May, around the time of Mother’s Day, you have peonies \u2014 which are, it happens, spectacular \u2014 but you do not have the year-round uniformity of product that the industrial supply chain provides. Amber Flack, of Little Acre Flowers in Washington, D.C., frames this constraint as a selling point: “The closer to the source, the less distance there is to travel.” Laura Beth Resnick, of Butterbee Farm in Baltimore, is direct about the limits: “I can’t really grow roses in the mid-Atlantic so I don’t try.” This kind of honest acknowledgment \u2014 of what grows where, and when, and at what cost \u2014 is itself a form of integrity that the market increasingly recognises and rewards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Slow Flowers movement is not without its tensions. It is, by definition, a movement for producers and consumers in wealthy markets \u2014 the people who can afford locally grown, seasonally limited, artisanally arranged flowers, which cost more than their industrial equivalents. Its self-policing mechanisms are imperfect; some farms market crops as domestically grown that are partially imported. And the movement’s environmental logic, compelling at the level of individual purchasing decisions, does not straightforwardly address the systemic labor and environmental conditions of the Global South’s cut-flower industry, which will continue to exist regardless of whether American florists source locally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These are real limitations. They do not, however, negate the argument. They complicate it, which is what honest arguments about complex systems tend to do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

VI. The Thing Under the Arrangement<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Floral foam is not a glamorous subject. It is, in the context of a conversation about mindful floristry, an almost absurdly literal one \u2014 a question about the physical material holding the flowers in place, rather than about the emotional material holding the holiday in place. But the floral foam reckoning that is currently underway in the industry is worth examining precisely because of what it reveals about the difficulty of meaningful change in a sector with tight margins, ingrained habits, and a customer base that mostly does not know what floral foam is.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Floral foam is the dense green brick that has sat at the bottom of arranged bouquets for decades. Made from phenol-formaldehyde \u2014 a plastic \u2014 it absorbs water, holds stems in position, and makes it possible to construct the kinds of geometric, gravity-defying arrangements that define the commercial floral aesthetic. It is also, research has made abundantly clear, an environmental catastrophe. A single block contains the plastic equivalent of ten shopping bags. It does not biodegrade. It breaks into microplastics that contaminate waterways, are ingested by aquatic animals, and have been found in the food chain. A study by RMIT University found that the microplastics from floral foam leached chemicals into surrounding water that were more toxic to aquatic invertebrates than leachates from other plastic families. The florists who work with it daily are exposed to formaldehyde, barium sulfates, and carbon black \u2014 carcinogenic or hazardous compounds \u2014 as a routine occupational matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

None of this is new information, precisely. What is relatively new is the industry’s willingness to act on it. Since 2023, floral foam has been prohibited at RHS shows, including the Chelsea Flower Show \u2014 a signal from one of the world’s most influential horticultural institutions that the material’s convenience no longer justifies its cost. Blooming Haus, a London florist that holds both Planet Mark and B Corp certification, has replaced floral foam with kenzans, chicken wire, moss, and reusable water vessels. New biodegradable alternatives are entering the market, including Sideau, a foam substitute made without plastic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The challenge is that giving up floral foam is genuinely difficult. It is not simply a matter of substituting one material for another; it requires rethinking how arrangements are constructed from the ground up. The sharp angles, the precise geometric placements, the ability to position a stem at an exact angle \u2014 these are all affordances of foam that alternatives do not straightforwardly replicate. For a florist facing the highest-volume weekend of the year, with orders to fulfill and margins to protect, the foam-free commitment is a real cost, not an abstract one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Which is precisely the point. The florists who are making this transition are choosing environmental integrity over commercial convenience at the worst possible moment to do so \u2014 and in doing so, communicating something about their values that no marketing copy could convey as credibly. This is what genuine commitment to sustainability looks like, as opposed to its counterfeit: not a claim in an “About Us” page, but a choice that costs something.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

VII. The Commerce of Grief<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

There is a tendency, when discussing the emotional dimensions of holiday marketing, to frame sensitivity as a form of commercial restraint \u2014 as the responsible choice to leave money on the table in order to avoid causing harm. The data from the florists who have pursued this approach suggests the framing is wrong. Mindful marketing is not restraint; it is a different, and in many cases more effective, form of commercial strategy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evidence is consistent. Bloom & Wild’s opt-out campaign did not reduce its Mother’s Day revenue; it generated four times its normal rate of customer engagement and produced the kind of brand loyalty that advertising budgets cannot purchase directly. Florists aligned with the Slow Flowers movement charge a premium for locally sourced arrangements and find customers not only willing to pay it but more likely to become repeat customers and advocates than those who buy from conventional suppliers. The florists who have expanded their definition of motherhood report broader rather than narrower markets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The commercial logic here is worth spelling out, because it challenges an assumption that has shaped the industry’s marketing for a century. The assumption is that the holiday’s emotional territory \u2014 the sentiment, the love, the obligation \u2014 is fixed and finite, that capturing a share of it is a zero-sum competition, and that any marketing that does not squeeze maximum urgency from every available customer is leaving money on the floor. The mindful marketing argument is that this model is wrong on its own terms: that the emotional territory of the holiday is not fixed, that it can be expanded by treating more kinds of people as genuine participants in it, and that the commercial gains from doing so substantially outweigh the marginal gains from optimising within the existing model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mother’s Day is, by some measures, the second-most-commercially-significant holiday for florists, surpassed only by Valentine’s Day. In 2024, consumers spent over $35 billion on the occasion, with flowers among the top three categories. The average purchase by consumers who bought from local florists reached a record high. The market is not contracting; there is no scarcity of demand to justify the argument that sensitivity is a luxury. There is, on the contrary, evidence that sensitivity is a growth strategy \u2014 that the florists who treat their customers as complex human beings rather than transactional units are capturing a disproportionate share of a growing market.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This does not mean that every opt-out campaign is genuine, or that every “locally sourced” claim is accurate, or that every expansion of the definition of motherhood in a florist’s marketing represents a real change in the texture of the customer experience. Authenticity is the hardest thing to manufacture and the easiest to lose, and the floral industry, like every other industry, contains its share of brands that have adopted the language of mindfulness as a marketing veneer without any of its substance. Customers, increasingly, can tell the difference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The most credible practitioners of mindful floristry are those for whom the values were there first \u2014 who built their businesses around sustainability, inclusivity, and genuine customer care, and for whom the marketing is a reflection of practice rather than a substitute for it. The foam-free florist who has invested in new infrastructure. The opt-out florist who has trained every staff member in the purpose of the campaign. The locally sourced florist who can name the farm and the grower and the variety for everything in the cooler. These are not performances of mindfulness; they are its expression.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

VIII. What Jarvis Actually Wanted<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Returning to Anna Jarvis at this point is not mere symmetry, though it is also that. It is an attempt to locate, in the person who most clearly saw what was wrong with the commercialisation of her holiday, something that might help clarify what getting it right would look like.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jarvis protested outside florists not because she hated flowers. She loved them; the white carnation was her symbol, chosen for her mother, and she wore one on the first Mother’s Day she organised. She protested because she believed that florists were selling the surface of a gesture while discarding its meaning \u2014 that the purchase of a ready-made bouquet at a marked-up price was being substituted for the kind of personal, specific, attentive love the holiday was supposed to honor. Her ideal observance was a visit, or a long letter. Something that cost not money but time and attention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The florists who are doing the most interesting work today are, in some sense, trying to honor that distinction \u2014 not by abandoning the commerce of flowers, which is their livelihood, but by trying to ensure that the commerce is in the service of the gesture rather than its replacement. The opt-out campaign works because it treats the customer’s emotional reality as more important than the marketing calendar. The sustainable sourcing commitment works because it insists that the beauty of the flower should not be purchased at invisible cost. The expanded definition of motherhood works because it refuses to exclude from the holiday’s emotional territory the people whose experiences of care and love are not reflected in its standard imagery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

None of this would have entirely satisfied Jarvis. She wanted the holiday freed from commerce altogether \u2014 wanted it returned to the private, personal, unreplicable realm of family and feeling. That project was lost approximately forty-eight hours after the holiday was officially proclaimed, and there is no serious prospect of recovering it. The commercial event exists; it generates billions of dollars; it will continue to do so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But within that commercial event, something is available that was not available five years ago: a set of practices, pioneered by individual florists and gradually diffusing through the industry, that treat the holiday’s emotional complexity as a design constraint rather than an inconvenience. That ask, before the email is sent, who might receive it and how it might land. That stock forget-me-nots alongside the roses, not because there is a large market for grief arrangements but because there is a real need for them, and the florist who meets that need has done something that cannot be reduced to a transaction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jarvis would, one imagines, still have found something to protest. The woman who spent three decades of her life in argument with an industry was not built for satisfaction. But she might, also, have recognised something in the quiet revolution underway: a belated, partial, commercially motivated, and nonetheless genuine attempt to restore some of what she had originally imagined \u2014 the sense that the flower is not a product but a gesture, and that gestures, unlike products, carry obligations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The industry that paid her sanitarium bills is still very much in business. But it is, in small and meaningful ways, beginning to remember what it is actually selling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

IX. The Question the Market Is Asking<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

There is a florist \u2014 hypothetical but representative of a real type \u2014 who sits down in late April to draft the Mother’s Day email campaign and feels, for the first time, a hesitation she did not feel the year before. She knows her open rates. She knows her conversion metrics. She knows which subject lines historically perform best, and none of them involve acknowledging that the holiday might be difficult. She has been in this business long enough to know that peak season rewards decisiveness and punishes sentimentality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And yet. She thinks about the woman who came in last September, buying flowers for a grave. She thinks about the customer who replied to last year’s Mother’s Day email with a message that was polite but legible as pain. She thinks about the review she received from someone who said that the staff member’s instinctive “What are you getting for your mom?” had made a difficult errand harder than it needed to be.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

She does not opt out of the campaign. She cannot afford to. But she changes the language. She adds an opt-out link. She briefs her staff on what to ask and what not to assume. She moves the forget-me-nots to the front of the shop for the first two weeks of May.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These are small changes. They are also, given everything, the beginning of a different kind of business \u2014 one that has decided, on the evidence available, that treating customers as complex human beings is not in tension with commercial success. That the market for genuine care is larger, and more loyal, and more durable, than the market for optimised urgency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whether this nascent shift can resist the gravity of an industry that has spent a century moving in the opposite direction remains genuinely uncertain. The pressures are real. The quarterly targets are real. The email sequences that fire automatically at four in the morning are real. The industry that outlasted Anna Jarvis and absorbed her protests and paid her bills and continued, serenely, to sell carnations \u2014 that industry is still here, and it is still very good at what it does.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But the question the market is asking has changed. It is no longer only: how do we sell more flowers? It is also, with increasing insistence: to whom? And at what cost? And in what spirit?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That those questions are being asked at all, by florists rather than regulators, by marketers rather than ethicists, by businesspeople calculating the return on investment in human care \u2014 is, if not a vindication of Anna Jarvis, at least a partial apology for what was done to her.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Flower Shop<\/a><\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

For more than a century, florists have profited enormou […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3619","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nWhat the Flower Industry Owes Mother's Day - Comma Blooms Florist - \u9999\u6e2f\u82b1\u5e97 | \u8a02\u82b1\u9001\u82b1<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"\u8cb7\u82b1 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8cb7\u82b1 \u5373\u65e5\u82b1\u675f \u9999\u6e2f\u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\u670d\u52d9 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8a02\u82b1 \u958b\u5f35\u9001\u79ae \u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/blog\/2026\/04\/22\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What the Flower Industry Owes Mother's Day - Comma Blooms Florist - \u9999\u6e2f\u82b1\u5e97 | \u8a02\u82b1\u9001\u82b1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u8cb7\u82b1 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8cb7\u82b1 \u5373\u65e5\u82b1\u675f \u9999\u6e2f\u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\u670d\u52d9 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8a02\u82b1 \u958b\u5f35\u9001\u79ae \u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/blog\/2026\/04\/22\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Comma Blooms Florist - \u9999\u6e2f\u82b1\u5e97 | \u8a02\u82b1\u9001\u82b1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-22T03:59:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-22T03:59:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/commablooms.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CB.png?fit=500%2C500&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"25 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/22\\\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/22\\\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9d60c58fa9cb378df8af4398b3abb517\"},\"headline\":\"What the Flower Industry Owes Mother’s Day\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T03:59:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-22T03:59:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/22\\\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":5614,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/#organization\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/22\\\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/22\\\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\\\/\",\"name\":\"What the Flower Industry Owes Mother's Day - Comma Blooms Florist - \u9999\u6e2f\u82b1\u5e97 | \u8a02\u82b1\u9001\u82b1\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T03:59:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-22T03:59:53+00:00\",\"description\":\"\u8cb7\u82b1 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8cb7\u82b1 \u5373\u65e5\u82b1\u675f \u9999\u6e2f\u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\u670d\u52d9 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8a02\u82b1 \u958b\u5f35\u9001\u79ae \u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/22\\\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/22\\\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/22\\\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"What the Flower Industry Owes Mother’s Day\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Comma Blooms \u8cb7\u82b1 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8cb7\u82b1 \u5373\u65e5\u82b1\u675f \u9999\u6e2f\u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\u670d\u52d9 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8a02\u82b1 \u958b\u5f35\u9001\u79ae \u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\",\"description\":\"\u8c6a\u83ef\u82b1\u5e97\uff0c\u70ba\u9999\u6e2f\u5cf6\u3001\u4e5d\u9f8d\u548c\u65b0\u754c\u7684\u7279\u6b8a\u5834\u5408\u63d0\u4f9b\u82b1\u675f\u905e\u9001\u670d\u52d9\u3002Luxury flower shop for flower bouquet delivery for special occasions in Hong Kong Island, Kowloon and New Territories.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Comma Blooms\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Comma Blooms \u8cb7\u82b1 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8cb7\u82b1 \u5373\u65e5\u82b1\u675f \u9999\u6e2f\u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\u670d\u52d9 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8a02\u82b1 \u958b\u5f35\u9001\u79ae \u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\",\"alternateName\":\"Comma Blooms\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/commablooms.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/CB.png?fit=500%2C500&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/commablooms.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/CB.png?fit=500%2C500&ssl=1\",\"width\":500,\"height\":500,\"caption\":\"Comma Blooms \u8cb7\u82b1 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8cb7\u82b1 \u5373\u65e5\u82b1\u675f \u9999\u6e2f\u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\u670d\u52d9 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8a02\u82b1 \u958b\u5f35\u9001\u79ae \u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9d60c58fa9cb378df8af4398b3abb517\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/763d273a47815d2760faa1d2fd8d7e771a5e4c0ae63f081d8cb4a8a8bb75a43f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/763d273a47815d2760faa1d2fd8d7e771a5e4c0ae63f081d8cb4a8a8bb75a43f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/763d273a47815d2760faa1d2fd8d7e771a5e4c0ae63f081d8cb4a8a8bb75a43f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/commablooms.com\\\/en\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What the Flower Industry Owes Mother's Day - Comma Blooms Florist - \u9999\u6e2f\u82b1\u5e97 | \u8a02\u82b1\u9001\u82b1","description":"\u8cb7\u82b1 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8cb7\u82b1 \u5373\u65e5\u82b1\u675f \u9999\u6e2f\u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\u670d\u52d9 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8a02\u82b1 \u958b\u5f35\u9001\u79ae \u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/blog\/2026\/04\/22\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What the Flower Industry Owes Mother's Day - Comma Blooms Florist - \u9999\u6e2f\u82b1\u5e97 | \u8a02\u82b1\u9001\u82b1","og_description":"\u8cb7\u82b1 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8cb7\u82b1 \u5373\u65e5\u82b1\u675f \u9999\u6e2f\u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\u670d\u52d9 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8a02\u82b1 \u958b\u5f35\u9001\u79ae \u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1","og_url":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/blog\/2026\/04\/22\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\/","og_site_name":"Comma Blooms Florist - \u9999\u6e2f\u82b1\u5e97 | \u8a02\u82b1\u9001\u82b1","article_published_time":"2026-04-22T03:59:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-22T03:59:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":500,"height":500,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/commablooms.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CB.png?fit=500%2C500&ssl=1","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"25 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/blog\/2026\/04\/22\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/blog\/2026\/04\/22\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9d60c58fa9cb378df8af4398b3abb517"},"headline":"What the Flower Industry Owes Mother’s Day","datePublished":"2026-04-22T03:59:50+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-22T03:59:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/blog\/2026\/04\/22\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\/"},"wordCount":5614,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/#organization"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/blog\/2026\/04\/22\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\/","url":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/blog\/2026\/04\/22\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\/","name":"What the Flower Industry Owes Mother's Day - Comma Blooms Florist - \u9999\u6e2f\u82b1\u5e97 | \u8a02\u82b1\u9001\u82b1","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-22T03:59:50+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-22T03:59:53+00:00","description":"\u8cb7\u82b1 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8cb7\u82b1 \u5373\u65e5\u82b1\u675f \u9999\u6e2f\u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\u670d\u52d9 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8a02\u82b1 \u958b\u5f35\u9001\u79ae \u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/blog\/2026\/04\/22\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/commablooms.com\/blog\/2026\/04\/22\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/blog\/2026\/04\/22\/what-the-flower-industry-owes-mothers-day\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"What the Flower Industry Owes Mother’s Day"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/","name":"Comma Blooms \u8cb7\u82b1 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8cb7\u82b1 \u5373\u65e5\u82b1\u675f \u9999\u6e2f\u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\u670d\u52d9 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8a02\u82b1 \u958b\u5f35\u9001\u79ae \u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1","description":"\u8c6a\u83ef\u82b1\u5e97\uff0c\u70ba\u9999\u6e2f\u5cf6\u3001\u4e5d\u9f8d\u548c\u65b0\u754c\u7684\u7279\u6b8a\u5834\u5408\u63d0\u4f9b\u82b1\u675f\u905e\u9001\u670d\u52d9\u3002Luxury flower shop for flower bouquet delivery for special occasions in Hong Kong Island, Kowloon and New Territories.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Comma Blooms","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/#organization","name":"Comma Blooms \u8cb7\u82b1 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8cb7\u82b1 \u5373\u65e5\u82b1\u675f \u9999\u6e2f\u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\u670d\u52d9 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8a02\u82b1 \u958b\u5f35\u9001\u79ae \u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1","alternateName":"Comma Blooms","url":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/commablooms.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CB.png?fit=500%2C500&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/commablooms.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CB.png?fit=500%2C500&ssl=1","width":500,"height":500,"caption":"Comma Blooms \u8cb7\u82b1 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8cb7\u82b1 \u5373\u65e5\u82b1\u675f \u9999\u6e2f\u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1\u670d\u52d9 \u7db2\u4e0a\u8a02\u82b1 \u958b\u5f35\u9001\u79ae \u5373\u65e5\u9001\u82b1"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9d60c58fa9cb378df8af4398b3abb517","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/763d273a47815d2760faa1d2fd8d7e771a5e4c0ae63f081d8cb4a8a8bb75a43f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/763d273a47815d2760faa1d2fd8d7e771a5e4c0ae63f081d8cb4a8a8bb75a43f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/763d273a47815d2760faa1d2fd8d7e771a5e4c0ae63f081d8cb4a8a8bb75a43f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/blog\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3619","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3619"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3619\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3620,"href":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3619\/revisions\/3620"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3619"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3619"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commablooms.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3619"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}