The Peony Through History: A Botanical and Cultural Journey

The peony stands as one of humanity’s most ancient cultivated flowers, bridging millennia of botanical fascination, medicinal use, artistic inspiration, and horticultural innovation. This comprehensive exploration traces the peony’s journey from wild mountain slopes to modern gardens, revealing how a single genus captured human imagination across civilizations.

Botanical Classification and Origins

The genus Paeonia represents the sole genus in the family Paeoniaceae, distinct enough from other flowering plants to warrant its own family. Modern botanical classification recognizes approximately 33 species divided into three sections: herbaceous peonies that die back to ground level annually, woody tree peonies that maintain permanent above-ground structure, and a single species (P. suffruticosa subsp. rockii) representing an intermediate form.

Peonies originated in the Northern Hemisphere’s temperate regions, with species distribution across three primary centers: East Asia (China, Japan, Korea, Tibet), the Mediterranean and Near East, and western North America. This distribution pattern suggests ancient origins predating continental drift’s final configurations, with species evolving in isolation as mountain ranges rose and climates shifted.

Ancient Chinese Discovery and Cultivation (Before 1000 BCE – 1000 CE)

Early Medicinal Use

The earliest documented peony use appears in Chinese texts from the Shang Dynasty (1600-1046 BCE), where oracle bone inscriptions reference a plant scholars believe to be Paeonia lactiflora, the herbaceous Chinese peony. However, the first unambiguous botanical reference appears in the Shen Nong Ben Cao Jing (Divine Farmer’s Materia Medica), compiled around 200 BCE but containing knowledge transmitted orally for centuries.

This foundational pharmacological text describes bai shao (white peony) and chi shao (red peony), referring to processed roots of Paeonia lactiflora. The text attributes different medicinal properties to these preparations: white peony root (boiled and peeled) treated menstrual disorders, muscle spasms, and abdominal pain; red peony root (used raw or minimally processed) addressed blood stagnation, inflammation, and pain. This distinction between processing methods producing different therapeutic effects demonstrates sophisticated early pharmaceutical understanding.

Chinese physicians recognized multiple peony species for medicinal purposes. Paeonia lactiflora (herbaceous peony) provided the primary medicinal roots, while Paeonia veitchii from western China offered alternative sources. The roots contain paeoniflorin, a monoterpene glycoside with documented anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and neuroprotective properties, validating traditional medical applications through modern pharmacological analysis.

The Discovery of Tree Peonies

The tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa, known as mu dan or “tree peony” in Chinese) represents one of history’s most significant horticultural discoveries. Unlike herbaceous peonies dying back to ground level, tree peonies develop woody stems persisting year-round, eventually forming shrubs reaching 2 meters in height with stems 10 centimeters in diameter.

The exact timeline of tree peony discovery remains uncertain, but historical records suggest awareness by the Qin Dynasty (221-206 BCE) and definite cultivation by the Han Dynasty (206 BCE – 220 CE). Early tree peonies grew wild in the mountains of Gansu, Shaanxi, Sichuan, and Hubei provinces, where they inhabited rocky slopes and forest margins at elevations between 1,000-3,000 meters.

The wild tree peony exhibited simple flowers with five to thirteen petals, typically in shades of pink, purple, or white. These wild forms (Paeonia rockii, now recognized as distinct from P. suffruticosa) displayed a characteristic dark purple-maroon blotch at the petal base, a genetic marker still visible in many modern cultivars derived from these ancestors.

Imperial Patronage and the Luoyang Tradition

The tree peony achieved cultural prominence during the Sui Dynasty (581-618 CE) when Emperor Yang ordered peony collection for the imperial gardens in Luoyang. However, the golden age arrived during the Tang Dynasty (618-907 CE), when Empress Wu Zetian, China’s only female emperor, championed peony cultivation. Legend claims she banished peonies from the imperial palace for refusing to bloom out of season at her command, inadvertently establishing Luoyang as China’s peony capital—a status it maintains 1,300 years later.

Tang Dynasty poets celebrated peonies with fervor bordering on obsession. Li Bai (701-762 CE), China’s most famous poet, compared peonies to beautiful women, establishing metaphorical connections persisting throughout Chinese literature. The association between peonies and feminine beauty, wealth, and aristocratic refinement became deeply embedded in Chinese culture.

During the Tang Dynasty, Luoyang gardeners developed the first documented peony cultivars through selective breeding. Early breeding efforts focused on increasing petal count (creating “double” flowers), expanding color range, and enlarging bloom size. By the Song Dynasty (960-1279 CE), growers had developed techniques for creating semi-double and fully double flowers with hundreds of petals.

Song Dynasty Scientific Documentation

The Song Dynasty produced China’s first systematic botanical treatises on peonies, representing early attempts at scientific horticultural documentation. Ouyang Xiu’s Luoyang Peony Chronicle (1034 CE) catalogued 24 varieties, describing flowers, colors, growth habits, and cultivation requirements with unprecedented precision. This text established a tradition of systematic horticultural record-keeping that influenced botanical documentation for centuries.

Zhou Shihou’s Luoyang Famous Gardens Chronicle (around 1082 CE) described cultivation techniques including grafting, a revolutionary development allowing superior varieties to be propagated while maintaining genetic identity. Song gardeners grafted prized tree peony cultivars onto herbaceous peony roots (Paeonia lactiflora), creating vigorous plants that flowered reliably. This technique remained standard practice in Chinese tree peony cultivation for nine centuries.

The most comprehensive Song Dynasty peony text, Zhang Bangji’s Peony Cultivation Book (around 1178 CE), documented cultivation methods including soil preparation, watering schedules, pest management, winter protection, and even techniques for forcing early bloom for the lunar new year. The text described 163 varieties, noting subtle differences in petal shape, color gradations, fragrance, and blooming time.

Song Dynasty classifications organized peonies by color families: single colors (red, purple, pink, white, yellow), bicolors, and variegated patterns. Growers recognized nine color grades from pure white through pink shades to deep purple-red, with yellow peonies considered especially precious. This color classification system influenced peony breeding priorities for centuries.

Discovery of Yellow Tree Peonies

Yellow tree peonies represent one of horticulture’s most significant color breakthroughs, as the species Paeonia suffruticosa lacks genes for yellow pigmentation. The yellows developed during Song Dynasty cultivation derived from hybridization with Paeonia lutea, a species with clear yellow flowers native to Yunnan province in southwestern China.

Paeonia lutea grows wild at elevations of 2,800-3,800 meters in the mountains of Yunnan and Tibet, where it inhabits scrubland and forest margins. Unlike P. suffruticosa with its large, opulent blooms, P. lutea produces smaller single flowers of bright yellow, typically with 5-8 petals. The species remained largely unknown outside its native range until the early 20th century.

Historical records suggest that yellow tree peonies appeared in Chinese cultivation during the Song Dynasty, though the exact mechanism of hybridization remains unclear. Natural hybrids between P. suffruticosa and P. lutea likely occurred where ranges overlapped in mountainous regions, with Chinese gardeners recognizing and propagating these valuable mutations. The resulting cultivars, while initially rare and expensive, gradually spread through elite gardens.

Mediterranean and European Discovery (Ancient Greece – 1800s)

Ancient Greek Medicine

The genus name Paeonia derives from Paeon, physician to the Greek gods in mythology. According to legend, Paeon used a peony root given by Leto (Apollo’s mother) to heal Pluto after Hercules wounded him during the Trojan War. The god Asclepius, jealous of Paeon’s skill, attempted to murder him, but Zeus saved Paeon by transforming him into the peony flower.

This mythological origin reflects the peony’s established medicinal reputation in ancient Greece. Greek physician Dioscorides (40-90 CE) described peony in De Materia Medica, his comprehensive pharmacological encyclopedia. Dioscorides distinguished between male and female peonies (likely Paeonia mascula and P. officinalis), attributing different therapeutic properties to each.

Greek medicine employed peony roots for epilepsy, menstrual disorders, and childbirth complications. The seeds, worn as amulets, supposedly protected against nightmares and possession by evil spirits. These superstitious applications coexisted with legitimate medical uses, as peony roots contain compounds with demonstrable sedative and antispasmodic effects.

Roman Expansion and Pliny’s Documentation

Roman naturalist Pliny the Elder (23-79 CE) devoted extensive attention to peonies in his Natural History, describing collection, preparation, and medical applications. Pliny noted that peony roots must be gathered at night, as doing so in daylight risked attack by woodpeckers that defended the plant (a superstition reflecting the difficulty of wild collection in remote mountain habitats).

Pliny described both Paeonia officinalis (the common European peony) and P. mascula (the male peony), distinguishing them by root structure, flower color, and medicinal properties. His descriptions, while mixing accurate observation with folklore, provided information that guided European herbalists for over a millennium.

The Roman Empire’s expansion spread peony cultivation throughout Europe. Wild peonies grew in mountainous regions from Spain to Greece, providing material for medical use. However, the Romans apparently made little progress in horticultural development, treating peonies primarily as medicinal herbs rather than ornamental plants.

Medieval Monastery Gardens

During the Middle Ages, European monasteries preserved botanical knowledge and maintained medicinal herb gardens. Peonies occupied important positions in these gardens, cultivated primarily for therapeutic applications. The ninth-century plan of the Abbey of St. Gall in Switzerland included a designated herb garden where peonies grew alongside other medicinal plants.

Medieval herbals repeated and embellished classical descriptions of peony’s medical properties. The Herbarius Latinus (around 1484), one of the first printed herbals, included woodcut illustrations of peonies with text describing uses for epilepsy, kidney stones, and various pains. These books spread standardized botanical information throughout Europe, though they often perpetuated ancient errors alongside accurate observations.

The medieval association between peonies and protection against evil persisted. Peony seeds were carved into beads worn around the neck to prevent epileptic seizures, nightmares, and demonic influence. While modern medicine recognizes no such properties, the tradition reflects the peony’s powerful cultural and psychological significance.

Renaissance Botanical Illustration and Classification

The Renaissance brought new scientific rigor to botanical study. Flemish botanist Rembert Dodoens published Cruydeboeck (1554), an herbal featuring detailed peony descriptions and improved illustrations distinguishing species by leaf shape, root structure, and flower characteristics. German botanist Leonhart Fuchs’s De Historia Stirpium (1542) included color illustrations of Paeonia officinalis that influenced botanical art for centuries.

Italian botanist Andrea Cesalpino’s De Plantis (1583) attempted systematic plant classification based on morphological characteristics rather than medical properties, representing early steps toward modern taxonomy. Cesalpino grouped peonies with other plants sharing similar fruit and seed structures, presaging the recognition that peonies represented a distinct family.

The establishment of botanic gardens in Padua (1545), Leiden (1590), and Oxford (1621) provided institutions for systematic plant study. These gardens cultivated peonies alongside other medicinal and ornamental species, enabling comparative study and documentation. The collection of herbarium specimens—pressed and dried plants mounted on paper with detailed labels—created permanent records for future study.

European Species Differentiation

By the 18th century, botanists recognized multiple European peony species, though classification schemes varied. Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus, in Species Plantarum (1753), described several species including Paeonia officinalis (common peony), P. mascula (male peony), and P. tenuifolia (fernleaf peony). Linnaeus’s binomial nomenclature system provided standardized naming conventions, though his species concepts required subsequent revision as botanical knowledge expanded.

Paeonia officinalis, native to southern Europe from France through the Balkans, produces large magenta-pink flowers and deeply divided leaves. Wild plants typically have 5-10 petals, but cultivated forms with semi-double and double flowers appeared in European gardens by the 16th century. This species tolerates a wide range of conditions, contributing to its popularity in early European horticulture.

Paeonia mascula, found throughout Mediterranean regions from Spain to Turkey, differs in having less divided foliage and slightly smaller flowers, typically in shades of pink to purple. Paeonia tenuifolia, the fernleaf peony from the steppes of southeast Europe and Asia Minor, produces finely divided ferny foliage and deep red flowers, making it distinctive among European species.

Paeonia peregrina from southern Europe and Turkey produces brilliant orange-red flowers, representing the brightest red coloration among European species. This species contributed significantly to later breeding programs seeking intense red coloration in hybrid peonies.

Asian Peonies Reach the West (1600s-1800s)

Early Trade Routes and Botanical Exchange

European contact with Asia through trade routes opened channels for botanical exchange. Portuguese traders reached China in 1557, establishing Macau as a permanent trading post. Dutch merchants arrived in Japan in 1609, confined to the island of Dejima in Nagasaki harbor. These limited contact points enabled some plant transfer, though Chinese and Japanese authorities severely restricted foreign movement and botanical collecting.

Early European visitors to Asia marveled at Chinese and Japanese gardens, describing tree peonies in letters and journals. However, the difficulties of long sea voyages, lack of proper plant transportation methods, and Asian restrictions on exports prevented substantial live plant transfers before the late 18th century.

The first tree peony to reach Europe arrived as a dried herbarium specimen rather than living plant. Engelbert Kaempfer, a German physician working for the Dutch East India Company in Japan (1690-1692), collected and documented Japanese plants. His posthumously published Amoenitatum exoticarum (1712) described tree peonies, though his specimens provided only anatomical information without capturing the flowers’ living beauty.

Sir Joseph Banks and the Introduction to England

The systematic introduction of Asian peonies to Europe began with Sir Joseph Banks, director of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Banks, who had sailed with Captain Cook on his first voyage (1768-1771), recognized botanical collecting’s scientific and economic importance. He established a network of plant collectors and correspondents throughout the British Empire and trading posts.

In 1789, through the East India Company, Banks received the first living tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa) to successfully reach England. The plant survived the months-long sea voyage packed in a Wardian case (a sealed glass container maintaining humidity), arriving at Kew where it was carefully cultivated. This single plant, a semi-double pink form, generated enormous excitement among British horticulturists.

The successful introduction sparked intense demand for additional varieties. However, Chinese authorities maintained strict export controls, and the expense of long-distance plant transport limited trade. Throughout the 1790s and early 1800s, only wealthy aristocrats and botanical institutions could acquire tree peonies, which commanded prices equivalent to thousands of modern dollars per plant.

The East India Company and Expanded Introductions

The British East India Company’s Canton factory (trading post) facilitated increased botanical exchange in the early 19th century. Company employees, recognizing the commercial potential of ornamental plants, arranged shipments of Chinese cultivars. Between 1789 and 1820, approximately 20-30 tree peony varieties reached England, representing different colors, forms, and petal configurations.

These early imports included single-flowered forms in white, pink, and purple, as well as semi-double and double varieties. Chinese names often described flower characteristics: ‘Zhao Fen’ (Zhao’s Pink), ‘Hu Hong’ (Rouge Red), ‘Er Qiao’ (Two Qiaos), the last named for legendary beauties and featuring pink-and-white bicolor flowers. English nurserymen assigned Western names, sometimes retaining translations of Chinese names, other times honoring patrons or describing flower traits.

The difficulty of propagation initially limited distribution. Tree peonies resist division (unlike herbaceous peonies that readily separate into multiple plants), and cutting propagation requires precise timing and conditions. English gardeners gradually learned grafting techniques, though results remained inconsistent. The high failure rate, combined with limited stock plants, kept prices elevated for decades.

French Botanical Missions and Systematic Collection

French botanical exploration in Asia intensified under Napoleon, who recognized science’s role in national prestige and economic development. The Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle in Paris sent collectors to document and acquire plants. Though political upheavals interrupted some missions, French botanists eventually accessed Chinese nurseries and wild habitats.

French missionaries in China, particularly Jesuit priests with special privileges at the Qing court, facilitated botanical transfers. Père Jean-Baptiste Du Halde’s Description géographique, historique, chronologique, politique, et physique de l’empire de la Chine (1735) had described Chinese peonies in detail, creating European awareness of varieties unavailable in the West. Later missionaries collected seeds and arranged plant shipments.

The French diplomat and amateur botanist Charles de Montigny, serving in China in the 1840s, sent numerous tree peony varieties to France. These introductions included yellows derived from Paeonia lutea hybrids, representing colors previously unknown in Western cultivation. The arrival of yellow tree peonies revolutionized European breeding programs.

Japanese Peonies Enter Western Gardens

Japan’s self-imposed isolation (sakoku policy) severely restricted foreign contact from 1639 to 1853, limiting botanical exchange to the Dutch trading post at Dejima. However, this single channel enabled some plant transfers. Philipp Franz von Siebold, a German physician employed by the Dutch East India Company in Nagasaki (1823-1829), studied Japanese flora systematically.

Siebold collected extensively, sending plants to Leiden Botanic Garden in the Netherlands. His Flora Japonica (1835-1870), co-authored with Joseph Gerhard Zuccarini, documented Japanese plants including several peony species and cultivars. Siebold introduced Paeonia japonica (now considered synonymous with P. obovata), a herbaceous woodland species with simple white or pink flowers.

Japanese tree peony cultivars, while similar to Chinese varieties, exhibited distinctive characteristics developed through centuries of independent breeding. Japanese cultivars tended toward larger, heavier flowers with substantial petal substance, often in shades of pink, white, and purple. The Japanese aesthetic preference for subtle colors and elegant form produced cultivars different in character from Chinese varieties favoring bright colors and dramatic forms.

Commodore Matthew Perry’s expedition to Japan (1853-1854), which forced the opening of Japanese ports to American trade, facilitated increased botanical collecting. American and European collectors subsequently introduced numerous Japanese cultivars, significantly expanding the genetic diversity available to Western breeders.

Scientific Exploration and Wild Species Discovery (1800s-1900s)

European Exploration in Western China

The 19th century witnessed systematic botanical exploration of Asia’s interior regions previously inaccessible to Western scientists. The mountainous provinces of western China—Gansu, Shaanxi, Sichuan, Yunnan, and Tibet—harbored extraordinary plant diversity, including numerous undescribed peony species.

French missionary Père Jean Marie Delavay, working in Yunnan province (1882-1894), collected over 200,000 botanical specimens representing 4,000 species, including several previously unknown peonies. Delavay discovered Paeonia delavayi (1883), a tree peony with small, nodding dark red to purple-brown flowers, quite unlike cultivated varieties. This species, growing at 2,300-3,800 meters elevation in Yunnan scrubland, represented a distinct genetic lineage.

Père Jean André Soulié, another French missionary-botanist working in Sichuan and Tibet (1885-1905), discovered additional species in remote mountain regions. These discoveries demonstrated that the genus Paeonia exhibited greater diversity than previously recognized, with multiple species occupying different ecological niches across Asia’s vast mountain ranges.

The Plant Hunters: Wilson, Farrer, and Rock

The early 20th century golden age of plant hunting brought systematic expeditions to China specifically targeting ornamental plants for Western gardens. Ernest Henry Wilson, collecting for Veitch Nurseries and later the Arnold Arboretum (1899-1922), made multiple expeditions to China, introducing thousands of plants including several peony species.

Wilson rediscovered Paeonia lutea (previously known from herbarium specimens) growing in Yunnan, sending seeds to England in 1903. This yellow-flowered tree peony, growing at high elevations, possessed remarkable hardiness. Wilson’s introductions enabled Western gardeners to cultivate this species, setting the stage for breeding programs that would create yellow hybrid tree peonies.

Wilson also collected Paeonia delavayi varieties, documenting the species’ range and variation. He observed wild tree peonies growing in apparently natural settings, though he noted that centuries of Chinese plant use made distinguishing truly wild plants from naturalized cultivated escapes difficult.

Reginald Farrer, English plant collector and writer, explored Gansu province (1914-1915), discovering populations of tree peonies growing in remote mountain gorges. Farrer described encountering Paeonia suffruticosa var. spontanea (wild tree peony) growing on limestone cliffs, producing simple pink or white flowers with the characteristic purple basal blotch. His vivid descriptions in On the Eaves of the World (1917) captured the romance of discovering peonies in wild mountain habitats.

Joseph Rock and Paeonia rockii

Perhaps the most significant peony discovery of this era came through Joseph Rock, Austrian-American botanist and explorer working in western China and Tibet (1920s-1940s). Rock, employed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and later Harvard University, spent decades in remote regions documenting plants, cultures, and languages.

In 1925-1926, while exploring the Min Mountains on the Gansu-Sichuan border, Rock encountered extensive wild populations of tree peonies growing at 2,500-3,500 meters elevation. These plants differed from cultivated Paeonia suffruticosa, displaying larger purple basal blotches, distinctive leaf structures, and greater hardiness. Rock sent seeds to the United States, where they grew into plants clearly distinct from existing cultivated forms.

These plants, eventually recognized as Paeonia rockii (though this taxonomic status remains debated, with some botanists treating them as P. suffruticosa subsp. rockii), possessed exceptional garden qualities: extreme cold hardiness (surviving -30°C), large flowers (15-25 cm diameter), distinctive coloration with prominent dark flares, and vigorous growth. The discovery revolutionized tree peony breeding, contributing cold-hardiness and distinctive patterns to modern cultivars.

Rock’s collections included not only P. rockii but also local cultivated varieties maintained in Tibetan monastery gardens. These “Gansu peonies” represented ancient lineages preserved in isolation, differing from eastern Chinese cultivars. The rediscovery of these ancient varieties provided breeding material combining wild vigor with partial domestication.

Discovery of Additional Species

Botanical exploration throughout the 20th century revealed additional Paeonia species, expanding understanding of the genus’s diversity. Paeonia jishanensis, discovered in Shanxi province in the 1990s, represents a distinct species with yellow flowers and unusual leaf characteristics. Paeonia qiui, described from Shaanxi province, exhibits distinctive botanical features separating it from closely related species.

In Europe, taxonomic work refined species concepts. Paeonia officinalis, previously considered a single variable species, was split into multiple taxa based on leaf structure, flower characteristics, and geographic distribution. Similarly, Mediterranean peonies underwent taxonomic revision, with botanists recognizing additional species including Paeonia broteri, P. cambessedesii, and P. clusii.

Western North American explorations documented native peony species. Paeonia brownii, found in California and the Pacific Northwest, produces small nodding reddish flowers and deeply divided foliage. Paeonia californica, native to California chaparral, displays similar characteristics adapted to Mediterranean climate with dry summers. These species remain primarily of botanical rather than horticultural interest, as their flowers lack the size and showiness of Asian and European species.

The Herbaceous Hybrid Revolution (1850-1950)

Victor Lemoine and the First Hybrids

While tree peonies dominated early 19th-century peony enthusiasm, herbaceous peonies underwent their own revolutionary development. French nurseryman Victor Lemoine (1823-1911) pioneered systematic herbaceous peony breeding at his Nancy nursery, creating the first documented interspecific hybrids.

Lemoine crossed the Chinese Paeonia lactiflora (white or pink flowers, refined form, sweet fragrance) with the European Paeonia officinalis (bright magenta-pink, earlier bloom, robust constitution). The resulting hybrids, introduced starting in the 1850s, combined desirable traits from both parents: earlier bloom than pure P. lactiflora, extended color range, and improved vigor.

These early hybrids exhibited characteristics intermediate between parents, with flower forms ranging from single to semi-double, colors from pure white through pink shades to deep crimson, and bloom times spanning several weeks. Lemoine’s success demonstrated that controlled hybridization could create novel forms unavailable through selection within species.

The Age of Doubles: Chinese Lactiflora Cultivars

While Lemoine pursued interspecific hybridization, other breeders focused on Paeonia lactiflora, which had been cultivated in China for over two millennia but only reached Western gardens in significant numbers in the 1800s. Chinese cultivars, propagated through root division maintaining genetic identity, exhibited extraordinary flower forms developed through centuries of selection.

Chinese classifications organized P. lactiflora cultivars by flower form into distinct categories: single (5-10 petals in single or double rows), semi-double (multiple rows with visible stamens), Japanese form (outer guard petals with central mass of transformed stamens called staminodes), anemone form (similar to Japanese but with wider staminodes), double (multiple petal rows concealing stamens), and bomb double (outer guard petals with dense central ball of petals).

European and American collectors eagerly acquired Chinese cultivars, which reached the West through various channels. Some arrived via the East India Company’s Canton factory, others through missionaries and diplomats stationed in China, and still others through Japanese nurseries (as many Chinese cultivars had been introduced to Japan centuries earlier). By 1900, Western nurseries catalogued hundreds of P. lactiflora varieties.

American Breeding: Brand, Sass, and Auten

American breeders transformed herbaceous peonies in the early 20th century, creating cultivars that remain standard garden varieties today. The American Peony Society, founded in 1903, coordinated breeding efforts, established registration systems, and promoted peony cultivation.

A.P. Saunders (1869-1953), a professor of chemistry at Hamilton College in New York, approached peony breeding scientifically, maintaining detailed records of crosses, studying genetics, and pursuing specific breeding goals. Saunders pioneered interspecific hybridization on an unprecedented scale, crossing P. lactiflora with numerous other species.

Saunders’s most significant work involved incorporating Paeonia officinalis, P. peregrina, and P. tenuifolia into herbaceous hybrids. His crosses with P. peregrina, which possesses intense orange-red coloration, produced hybrids with colors previously unavailable in P. lactiflora—brilliant corals, intense reds, and novel bicolors. The variety ‘Coral Charm’ (introduced posthumously in 1964), with luminous coral-pink color fading to soft peach, exemplifies Saunders’s achievement.

Saunders also created the first herbaceous-tree peony hybrids (later termed Itoh hybrids after Japanese breeder Toichi Itoh who achieved the same cross). Though Saunders’s attempts produced weak plants that died in infancy, his work laid groundwork for subsequent breakthroughs.

Myron D. Bigger (1896-1986) focused on P. lactiflora varieties, pursuing exhibition quality blooms with perfect form, large size, and strong stems. Bigger’s introductions included ‘Festiva Maxima’ sports (color mutations) and selections emphasizing pure white coloration with minimal red marking. His varieties dominated peony shows for decades.

Roy G. Klehm and the Klehm family nursery in Illinois introduced dozens of varieties from the 1950s onward, emphasizing garden performance alongside show quality. Klehm varieties combined disease resistance, strong stems, attractive foliage, and reliable bloom. Many Klehm introductions—’Coral Sunset’, ‘Pink Hawaiian Coral’, ‘Pillow Talk’—became standard landscape varieties.

Japanese Breeding and Flower Form Innovation

Japanese breeders pursued distinctive aesthetic goals, valuing elegant simplicity over opulent fullness. The “Japanese form” peony, with outer guard petals surrounding a central boss of transformed stamens (staminodes), exemplifies Japanese aesthetic preferences. These staminodes, intermediate between stamens and petals, create contrasting color centers—white guards with yellow staminodes, or pink guards with red staminodes.

Toichi Itoh (1887-1956), a nurseryman in Tokyo, pursued the ultimate hybridization challenge: crossing herbaceous and tree peonies to combine the former’s reliability and the latter’s color range and flower substance. The two groups represent different Paeonia sections with distinct chromosome numbers, making hybridization extremely difficult.

Itoh worked for decades attempting the cross in both directions (herbaceous seed parent × tree peony pollen parent, and the reverse). Finally, in 1948, using P. lactiflora ‘Kakoden’ as seed parent and the yellow tree peony ‘Kinko’ as pollen parent, Itoh achieved success. Four seeds germinated, growing into plants that survived—an extraordinarily rare outcome given the genetic incompatibility between parents.

These plants, which Itoh named ‘Koshino-yuki’ (Snow in Koshi Province), ‘Kinpo’ (Gold Treasure), ‘Renzan’ (Lotus Mountain), and ‘Asahi-minato’ (Morning Harbor), exhibited intermediate characteristics: herbaceous top growth dying back annually like P. lactiflora, but with woody base, larger flowers, and expanded color range including yellow (inherited from the tree peony parent). Itoh died before seeing the plants bloom, but his assistant Shigao Ōshida continued his work.

Western Development of Itoh Hybrids

Itoh’s breakthrough remained largely unknown in the West until the 1960s, when Louis Smirnow, an American peony nurseryman, learned of the achievement and negotiated to acquire rights to the original four plants. Smirnow introduced the cultivars to American gardens in the 1970s, generating enormous enthusiasm despite high prices (initially hundreds of dollars per plant).

The Itoh hybrids (now officially termed intersectional hybrids by the American Peony Society) combined desirable traits: herbaceous habit with easy maintenance, tree peony flower substance and color range (particularly yellows unavailable in herbaceous peonies), and compact plant size suitable for smaller gardens. Their only significant drawback—slow propagation requiring grafting or tissue culture—kept prices elevated for decades.

American and European breeders pursued further intersectional breeding, creating second and subsequent generations. Don Hollingsworth in Iowa, Roger Anderson in Wisconsin, and Don Smith in Oregon introduced dozens of intersectional varieties expanding color range, improving flower form, and refining plant habit. Modern varieties like ‘Bartzella’ (clear yellow), ‘Julia Rose’ (cherry-red fading to rose and yellow), and ‘Cora Louise’ (white with lavender flares) demonstrate the potential of this hybrid group.

Tree Peony Breeding in the West (1900-2000)

French Breeders and Lutea Hybrids

The introduction of Paeonia lutea to Europe enabled entirely new breeding directions in tree peonies. French nurserymen, particularly Victor Lemoine and later Louis Henry at the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle in Paris, pursued crosses between P. lutea and P. suffruticosa.

These crosses proved challenging due to genetic incompatibility, low seed set, and frequent hybrid sterility. However, successful crosses produced plants combining P. lutea‘s yellow coloration with P. suffruticosa‘s larger flower size and double forms. The resulting “lutea hybrids” exhibited distinctive characteristics: clear yellow or apricot coloration, often with red flares or markings, and somewhat smaller flowers than pure P. suffruticosa cultivars.

Victor Lemoine introduced the first lutea hybrids in the 1900s, including ‘L’Espérance’ (yellow with red center) and ‘Alice Harding’ (clear light yellow). These varieties demonstrated that incorporating P. lutea could produce garden-worthy plants, though early cultivars exhibited somewhat weak growth and sparse bloom.

Louis Henry continued lutea hybrid development at the Paris botanical garden, introducing varieties in the 1920s-1940s. His cultivars, including ‘Chromatella’ (sulphur yellow) and ‘Souvenir de Maxime Cornu’ (yellow flushed orange with red markings), refined flower form while maintaining the novel yellow coloration.

American Breeders: Saunders and Daphnis

A.P. Saunders, already accomplished in herbaceous peony breeding, began working with tree peonies in the 1930s. Saunders acquired P. lutea plants and Chinese P. suffruticosa cultivars, pursuing systematic hybridization. His scientific approach, maintaining detailed crossing records and growing thousands of seedlings to evaluate, produced breakthrough results.

Saunders’s lutea hybrids emphasized garden performance over exhibition perfection. He selected for vigorous growth, abundant bloom, and reliable performance in diverse climates. His introductions, made posthumously in the 1950s-1960s, included ‘Age of Gold’ (clear yellow, semi-double), ‘Argosy’ (yellow with faint red edges), and ‘Chinese Dragon’ (deep red with golden undertones). These varieties combined P. lutea‘s hardiness and floriferous nature with improved flower size and substance.

Saunders also explored crosses between P. delavayi (the dark maroon-flowered tree peony from Yunnan) and P. lutea, creating hybrids with unique color combinations. These “Deco hybrids,” as they became known, produced flowers in bronze, mahogany, and burnt orange shades unavailable in other peony groups. The variety ‘Vesuvian’ exemplifies this group with its dark red-brown petals and contrasting yellow stamens.

Nassos Daphnis (1914-2010), a Greek-American abstract painter, pursued tree peony breeding as an artistic endeavor. Working in New York state from the 1950s through the 1990s, Daphnis created thousands of hybrids, selecting for qualities that appealed to his painter’s eye: pure colors, distinctive forms, and unusual color combinations.

Daphnis’s work with lutea hybrids produced varieties with exceptional clarity of color. ‘Leda’ (pure white with red flares), ‘Hesperus’ (soft yellow), and ‘Mysterious’ (deep garnet-red) demonstrate his achievement. Daphnis also pursued complex multi-generation hybrids, crossing his own seedlings to create novel genetic combinations not found in first-generation crosses.

Japanese Refinement: The Gansu Influence

Japanese breeders gained access to Paeonia rockii and related Gansu varieties in the mid-20th century, incorporating these genetics into Japanese cultivars. The resulting hybrids combined Japanese aesthetic sensibilities—elegant form, refined colors, perfect symmetry—with the distinctive purple-maroon basal flares characteristic of P. rockii.

Toichi Itoh and other Japanese breeders recognized that P. rockii possessed exceptional garden qualities beyond its role in intersectional hybridization. The species’ extreme cold hardiness (surviving winters in northern Japan and comparable climates), vigorous growth, and distinctive flares made it valuable in its own right.

Japanese nurseries began offering P. rockii selections and early-generation hybrids in the 1970s-1980s. These plants, often labeled “Gansu peonies” or “rock’s peonies,” exhibited large flowers (20-30 cm diameter when fully open), prominent dark basal flares creating dramatic contrast, and pure white, pale pink, or lavender coloration. Varieties like ‘Renkaku’ (pure white with purple flares) and ‘Taiyo’ (coral-pink with dark centers) became sought-after collector’s plants.

American Development of Rockii Hybrids

American breeders recognized P. rockii‘s potential for developing cold-hardy tree peonies suitable for northern gardens where traditional P. suffruticosa cultivars struggled. William Gratwick in New York, David Reath in Michigan, and Don Hollingsworth in Iowa pursued P. rockii hybridization programs from the 1970s onward.

These breeders focused on combining P. rockii‘s hardiness and flares with improved colors, double flower forms, and compact plant habit. The work required patience, as tree peonies take 5-7 years from seed to first bloom, meaning evaluation of a single cross generation required nearly a decade.

William Gratwick introduced varieties like ‘Thunderbolt’ (white with massive purple flares), ‘Boreas’ (pink with dark centers), and ‘Zephyrus’ (white with lavender flares and subtle pink edges). These cultivars demonstrated that P. rockii could contribute to garden-worthy plants beyond simple first-generation hybrids.

David Reath pursued complex multi-species crosses, combining P. rockii, P. lutea, and P. suffruticosa genetics. His three-way and four-way hybrids produced plants with unprecedented color combinations: yellows with purple flares, coral-pinks with maroon centers, and whites flushed with yellow and marked with dark blotches. Varieties like ‘Lemon Dream’ and ‘Garden Treasure’ exemplify this complex breeding.

Don Hollingsworth approached tree peony breeding with the same systematic methodology he applied to intersectional hybrids. Working in Iowa’s challenging climate (cold winters, hot humid summers), Hollingsworth selected seedlings that thrived under stress. His introductions, including ‘Scarlet Heaven’ and ‘White Phoenix’, combine beauty with exceptional garden performance.

Chinese Breeding Renaissance (1980s-Present)

China’s economic opening in the late 20th century enabled renewed horticultural development after decades of political disruption. Chinese peony breeders, drawing on vast genetic resources and centuries of accumulated knowledge, created modern cultivars combining traditional aesthetics with contemporary breeding techniques.

The city of Heze in Shandong province, China’s second peony capital (after Luoyang), became a major breeding center. Heze breeders developed hundreds of new P. suffruticosa cultivars, emphasizing extremely large flowers (some exceeding 30 cm diameter), novel colors (particularly blacks, near-blacks, and complex multicolors), and distinctive forms (including spider-petal types and varieties with split or ruffled petals).

Chinese breeders also pursued interspecific work, crossing P. rockii with P. suffruticosa to combine the former’s hardiness and flares with the latter’s refined forms and extended color range. These hybrids, termed “Central Plains peonies” or “Zhongyuan peonies” in Chinese classification, represent a distinct hybrid group combining characteristics of both parents.

Modern Chinese cultivars exhibit extraordinary diversity. Varieties like ‘Black Panther’ (deep purple-black, approaching true black), ‘Coral Terrace’ (coral-pink with orange undertones), and ‘Phoenix White’ (pure white with dramatically ruffled petals) demonstrate technical breeding achievement. Some newer varieties feature flowers with over 200 petals arranged in perfect geometrical patterns.

The reintegration of Chinese breeding into global peony development has accelerated progress dramatically. Western breeders now routinely use modern Chinese cultivars as breeding parents, accessing genetic diversity unavailable in Western collections. Conversely, Chinese breeders incorporate Western genetics, particularly P. lutea hybrids and P. rockii selections developed in America and Europe.

Modern Scientific Understanding (1950-Present)

Cytogenetics and Chromosome Studies

Modern botanical science has elucidated the genetic basis underlying peony diversity and hybridization challenges. Chromosome studies revealed that herbaceous peonies typically possess 10 chromosome pairs (diploid, 2n=10), while tree peonies generally have 5 pairs (2n=10, but fundamentally different from herbaceous species). This chromosomal incompatibility explains the difficulty of creating intersectional hybrids.

However, detailed cytological work revealed complexity beyond simple chromosome counts. Some tree peony species and cultivars exhibit polyploidy (multiple chromosome sets), with tetraploids (4n=20) occurring naturally or induced through chemical treatment. Polyploid tree peonies often display enhanced vigor, larger flowers, and greater substance, though fertility may be reduced.

The discovery that some intersectional hybrid success correlated with polyploidy in parent plants helped explain Itoh’s breakthrough. Modern breeders sometimes induce polyploidy using colchicine treatment, doubling chromosome numbers to facilitate otherwise impossible crosses. This technique has expanded possibilities for creating novel hybrids.

Chromosome mapping and genetic sequencing, now increasingly accessible, are revealing the genetic basis for specific traits. Researchers have identified genes controlling flower color, form, and fragrance, enabling molecular marker-assisted selection. While traditional breeding required growing seedlings to maturity (5-7 years for tree peonies), genetic markers potentially allow trait identification from seedling leaf tissue.

Biochemistry of Color and Fragrance

Scientific analysis has identified the chemical compounds producing peony colors and fragrances. The color palette results from three main pigment families: anthocyanins (reds, pinks, purples), carotenoids (yellows, oranges), and co-pigmentation effects (color modifications through pH and metal ion interactions).

White peonies lack anthocyanins but may contain carotenoids producing cream or ivory tones. Pink coloration results from moderate anthocyanin concentrations, while reds involve high concentrations. Purple colors arise from specific anthocyanin types (delphinidins) combined with alkaline cell sap pH. The near-black varieties prized in Chinese breeding result from extremely high anthocyanin concentrations.

Yellow coloration in tree peonies derives from carotenoids, specifically flavonols and carotenes. The genetic pathway for carotenoid synthesis exists in Paeonia lutea and P. delavayi but is suppressed or absent in P. suffruticosa. Breeding yellows into P. suffruticosa backgrounds requires transferring not just pigment genes but regulatory elements controlling their expression.

Coral and apricot colors involve complex interactions between carotenoids and anthocyanins. The variety ‘Coral Charm’, perhaps the most famous herbaceous peony, produces coral coloration through combined pigment systems, with color changing as flowers mature and pigment concentrations shift.

Peony fragrance involves volatile organic compounds, primarily terpenes and phenylpropanoids. Paeonia lactiflora produces distinctive rose-like fragrance from compounds including citronellol, geraniol, and linalool. Tree peonies generally lack fragrance, though some P. rockii hybrids produce subtle scents. Breeding programs pursuing fragrant tree peonies face challenges, as fragrance genes don’t readily transfer across species barriers.

Phylogenetic Analysis and Evolutionary History

DNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis have clarified relationships within Paeonia, revealing evolutionary history and suggesting breeding directions. Molecular studies confirm that the genus comprises three major clades: Section Paeonia (herbaceous peonies from Europe, Asia, and western North America), Section Moutan (woody tree peonies from China and Tibet), and Section Onaepia (a single species, P. brownii, from western North America, representing an ancient lineage).

Within Section Moutan, molecular analysis revealed that P. rockii diverged early from other tree peonies, explaining its distinctive characteristics and partial reproductive isolation from P. suffruticosa. The discovery that P. rockii represents a distinct evolutionary lineage rather than merely a wild form of P. suffruticosa has implications for breeding strategy and conservation.

Phylogenetic studies also revealed unexpected relationships between geographically separated species. Some Mediterranean and Asian herbaceous species show closer genetic relationships than geographic proximity would suggest, indicating either recent divergence or long-distance dispersal events in geological history.

Understanding evolutionary relationships guides breeding efforts. Species within the same phylogenetic clade generally cross more readily than distantly related species. However, some distant crosses produce vigorous hybrids through heterosis (hybrid vigor), while closely related species may exhibit reduced fertility due to chromosomal incompatibilities.

Conservation Genetics and Wild Populations

Modern conservation biology has documented alarming declines in wild peony populations throughout their native ranges. Habitat destruction, overcollection for medicinal use, and climate change threaten multiple species with extinction. Paeonia rockii, despite its horticultural importance, survives in only a few wild populations in Gansu and adjoining provinces, with total wild numbers perhaps under 1,000 individuals.

Genetic studies of wild populations reveal concerning patterns. Many populations exhibit low genetic diversity, suggesting small effective population sizes and inbreeding. Some cultivated “species” in botanical gardens have been found through DNA analysis to be ancient hybrids or selections rather than true wild types, complicating conservation efforts.

The Chinese government has established protected areas for important peony populations, and international organizations including the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) have assessed threat status. Paeonia rockii is listed as Endangered, while several other species receive varying conservation designations.

Ex situ conservation (preservation in botanical gardens and seed banks) complements wild habitat protection. Major botanical gardens maintain living collections representing wild-collected material with documented provenance. The Millennium Seed Bank at Kew Gardens stores peony seeds under controlled conditions, preserving genetic diversity for future restoration or research.

Ironically, horticulture provides some conservation benefit. Widely cultivated species and hybrids possess genetic security through distribution across thousands of gardens worldwide. However, cultivated plants typically represent narrow genetic samples, lacking the full diversity of wild populations. Conservation requires maintaining both cultivated varieties (preserving centuries of selective breeding) and wild germplasm (preserving evolutionary potential).

Cultural and Artistic Significance

Chinese Art and Literature

Throughout Chinese history, peonies have symbolized wealth, honor, prosperity, and feminine beauty. The flower’s associations became so deeply embedded in culture that Chinese art without peony references is notable for their absence rather than presence.

Tang Dynasty (618-907 CE) poets elevated peonies to near-religious status. Liu Yuxi’s poem “Peony Appreciation” compares peony viewing to religious pilgrimage, while Li Zhao’s writings describe peony enthusiasts bankrupting themselves to acquire rare varieties. The phrase “花王” (hua wang, “King of Flowers”) became peony’s standard epithet, placing it above all other flowers in the symbolic hierarchy.

Song Dynasty (960-1279 CE) painting established peonies as essential subjects. Artists including Zhao Chang, Cui Bai, and anonymous masters created detailed botanical paintings demonstrating close observation of plant structure, flower form, and growth habits. These works served simultaneously as aesthetic objects, botanical documentation, and symbols of cultural refinement.

The “bird and flower” (花鳥, huā niǎo) painting tradition, which reached its apex during Song and Ming dynasties, frequently featured peonies. These compositions combined botanical accuracy with symbolic meaning: peonies with phoenixes symbolized feminine beauty and immortality; peonies with rocks represented wealth and endurance; peonies with butterflies suggested romantic love.

Chinese ceramics from Tang Dynasty onward featured peony motifs. Potters reproduced peony flowers in three-dimensional form, carved peonies into wet clay, and painted stylized peony designs on finished vessels. The blue-and-white porcelain of the Ming and Qing dynasties frequently featured elaborate peony compositions, with individual pieces requiring hundreds of hours of detailed painting.

Textile arts incorporated peonies extensively. Silk brocades woven during the Song Dynasty created realistic peony images through complex weaving patterns. Embroiderers in Suzhou, China’s embroidery capital, developed techniques reproducing peonies in thread with photographic realism, using thousands of individual stitches in subtly graduated colors.

Chinese gardens incorporated peonies as living sculptures. The Luoyang tradition of spring peony festivals, established during the Tang Dynasty, continues today with gardens displaying thousands of blooming plants. The Heze peony festival, attracting over a million visitors annually, demonstrates the flower’s enduring cultural importance.

Japanese Aesthetics

Japanese culture adopted peonies from China around the 8th century CE, adapting them to distinctly Japanese aesthetic principles. While Chinese culture emphasized peonies’ opulence and associations with wealth, Japanese aesthetics found beauty in subtlety, asymmetry, and suggestion rather than ostentation.

Peonies appear frequently in Japanese art from the Heian period (794-1185 CE) onward. However, Japanese artists often depicted peonies alongside other flowers rather than as singular subjects, reflecting the principle that beauty emerges from relationships and context rather than isolated perfection.

The Rinpa school of painting (17th-18th centuries) created highly stylized peony images emphasizing decorative qualities. Artists including Tawaraya Sōtatsu and Ogata Kōrin reduced peonies to essential forms, using bold colors and dramatic compositions that influenced modern design. These images adorned screens, fans, and kimono textiles.

Ukiyo-e woodblock prints of the Edo period (1615-1868) frequently featured peonies, both as independent botanical subjects and as elements in larger compositions. Artists including Katsushika Hokusai and Utagawa Hiroshige created peony prints demonstrating technical mastery of the woodblock medium, with some prints requiring over 20 separate blocks to produce complete images.

Japanese gardens incorporated peonies with particular attention to seasonal timing and spatial relationships. The tradition of creating miniature landscape compositions included dwarf peonies in containers, trained and pruned to suggest ancient trees in miniature scale—a practice reflecting deeper aesthetic and philosophical principles.

European Symbolism and Art

European culture developed distinct peony symbolism, initially emphasizing medicinal properties before embracing aesthetic and symbolic dimensions. Medieval Christian art occasionally featured peonies as symbols of healing and divine grace, though roses and lilies dominated religious iconography.

The Renaissance brought renewed interest in botanical accuracy. Dutch and Flemish still-life paintings of the 17th century frequently included peonies alongside roses, tulips, and other flowers in elaborate arrangements demonstrating artistic skill and botanical knowledge. These paintings, ostensibly depicting flowers, actually functioned as memento mori—reminders of mortality through the inevitable decay of cut blooms.

Victorian England developed elaborate “language of flowers” (floriography) systems assigning specific meanings to different blooms. In this symbolic lexicon, peonies represented bashfulness, shame, or happy marriage, depending on color and context. Young women exchanged small bouquets (tussie-mussies) encoding messages through flower selection, with peonies playing roles in these botanical communications.

Art Nouveau at the turn of the 20th century embraced peonies’ sinuous forms and organic curves. Artists including Alphonse Mucha incorporated stylized peonies into posters, decorative panels, and architectural elements, reducing botanical forms to flowing lines and flat color areas that influenced graphic design for generations.

Impressionist and Post-Impressionist painters, particularly those influenced by Japanese art, frequently depicted peonies. Pierre-Auguste Renoir painted numerous peony still lifes emphasizing color and light rather than botanical accuracy. Vincent van Gogh’s flower paintings occasionally included peonies among mixed bouquets, their substantial forms providing compositional weight.

Modern Cultural Significance

In contemporary China, peonies retain powerful cultural resonance. The flower serves as Henan province’s symbol, and multiple cities celebrate annual peony festivals attracting millions of visitors. During the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), authorities attempted to suppress peony cultivation as a symbol of feudal aristocracy, but the flower’s cultural roots proved too deep—cultivation survived in private gardens and rural areas, reemerging stronger after political liberalization.

Luoyang’s International Peony Festival, established in its modern form in 1983, showcases thousands of cultivars across multiple garden sites. The Heze peony festival similarly displays the region’s breeding achievements. These events combine tourism, cultural celebration, and economic development, demonstrating how botanical heritage generates contemporary value.

In Japan, peonies retain aesthetic and cultural significance through traditional arts. Ikebana (flower arrangement) incorporates peonies in specific seasonal contexts, with arrangements following formal rules about placement, angle, and supporting materials. Tea ceremony occasionally features peony decorations in the tearoom’s alcove (tokonoma), though simpler flowers often receive preference in keeping with tea ceremony’s aesthetic of refined simplicity.

Western gardens have embraced peonies enthusiastically since the 19th century. The American Peony Society, founded in 1903, maintains registry systems, organizes shows, and promotes cultivation. Similar organizations exist in England, France, Canada, Australia, and other countries. These societies preserve cultivar histories, maintain evaluation programs for new varieties, and connect enthusiasts worldwide.

Modern peony shows attract hundreds of exhibitors and thousands of visitors. Competitors display individual blooms in standardized containers, judged on form, color, substance, and overall appeal. These events, while celebrating aesthetic achievement, also serve as evaluation systems for new introductions, with show performance influencing commercial success.

The cut flower industry has transformed peonies from seasonal garden plants to year-round commercial products. Advances in cold storage allow extending natural bloom seasons by months. Dutch, Chilean, Alaskan, and New Zealand growers coordinate production across hemispheres, supplying markets globally. Wedding industry demand for peonies (particularly white and blush varieties) has made them among the most commercially valuable cut flowers.

Medical and Pharmaceutical Applications

Traditional Chinese Medicine

Peony roots (Paeonia lactiflora) constitute one of traditional Chinese medicine’s fundamental ingredients, recorded in the earliest pharmacological texts and prescribed continuously for over 2,000 years. The Shen Nong Ben Cao Jing classified peony among “middle-grade” medicines—neither highly toxic nor extremely gentle, requiring careful dosing and combination with other ingredients.

Traditional medicine distinguishes between white peony root (bai shao) and red peony root (chi shao), though both derive from P. lactiflora. White peony root undergoes boiling and bark removal, producing medicine that “nourishes blood, regulates menstruation, and harmonizes the liver.” Red peony root receives minimal processing, creating medicine that “cools blood, disperses stasis, and reduces swelling.” This processing distinction creates medicines with different therapeutic profiles from the same botanical source.

Classical formulations incorporate peony root in complex prescriptions containing multiple herbs. Sì Wù Tāng (Four-Substance Decoction), dating to the Song Dynasty, combines peony root with Angelica sinensis, Ligusticum, and Rehmannia to treat menstrual irregularities and anemia. This formula, prescribed for over 800 years, remains among traditional medicine’s most commonly used prescriptions.

Shao Yao Gan Cao Tang (Peony and Licorice Decoction), an even simpler two-herb formula from the Shanghan Lun (Treatise on Cold Damage, around 220 CE), combines peony root with licorice root to treat painful muscle spasms and abdominal cramping. The formula’s elegant simplicity—just two ingredients—has fascinated medical practitioners for centuries, prompting extensive research into synergistic interactions between constituents.

Tree peony bark (mu dan pi, from Paeonia suffruticosa) serves distinct medical purposes. Traditional medicine categorizes it as a heat-clearing and blood-cooling medicine, prescribed for inflammatory conditions, fever, and hemorrhagic disorders. The bark contains different chemical constituents than root preparations, primarily paeonol and related compounds.

Modern Pharmacological Research

Scientific investigation has validated many traditional uses while elucidating mechanism of action. The primary active compound in Paeonia lactiflora root, paeoniflorin, demonstrates multiple pharmacological effects in laboratory studies: anti-inflammatory activity through inhibition of inflammatory mediators, analgesic effects through multiple pathways, antispasmodic activity on smooth muscle, and neuroprotective effects in models of neurological disease.

Studies have documented paeoniflorin’s effects on immune function. The compound modulates immune responses, reducing inflammation without completely suppressing immunity—a profile suggesting potential in treating autoimmune diseases where balanced immune regulation (rather than complete suppression) is therapeutic goal.

Clinical trials have examined peony preparations for various conditions. Studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis found that peony extract, particularly total glucosides of peony (TGP, a standardized preparation containing paeoniflorin and related compounds), reduced symptoms and inflammatory markers when used alongside conventional treatments. Similar studies examined applications in systemic lupus erythematosus, another autoimmune disease.

Research into women’s health applications—reflecting traditional uses for menstrual disorders—found evidence supporting peony’s effects on reproductive hormones and endometrium. Studies suggest that paeoniflorin influences estrogen and progesterone activity, though mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Modern research faces challenges in evaluating therapies traditionally used in complex multi-herb formulas, as studying isolated compounds may not capture synergistic effects.

Paeonol, the primary active compound in tree peony bark, demonstrates distinct pharmacological profile. Research documents anti-inflammatory, antipyretic (fever-reducing), analgesic, and cardiovascular effects. Paeonol influences blood coagulation pathways, potentially explaining traditional uses for hemorrhagic conditions, though this activity also raises safety concerns about bleeding risk.

Contemporary pharmaceutical development has explored creating modern medicines from peony constituents. In China, standardized peony extract preparations (particularly total glucosides of peony) receive regulatory approval for specific indications, prescribed alongside or as alternatives to Western pharmaceuticals. These products represent attempts to bridge traditional medicine and modern pharmacology through quality-controlled, standardized preparations of active compounds.

Cautions and Contraindications

Medical use of peony preparations requires appropriate caution. While generally considered safe when used appropriately, peony root preparations can cause adverse effects including gastrointestinal upset, dizziness, and allergic reactions in susceptible individuals. The anticoagulant effects of some peony compounds raise concerns about bleeding risk, particularly in combination with anticoagulant medications.

Pregnancy considerations are complex. Traditional Chinese medicine sometimes includes peony in formulas for pregnancy-related conditions, yet also cautions against certain uses. Modern safety data remain limited, with insufficient human studies to definitely establish safety during pregnancy and lactation. Most practitioners advise caution or avoidance during these periods absent clear medical supervision.

Quality control presents significant challenges. Commercial peony products vary dramatically in composition depending on species used, plant parts included, processing methods, and storage conditions. Active compound content varies by orders of magnitude between products, making dosing unpredictable unless using standardized extracts with verified chemical composition.

The integration of traditional peony medicine with modern pharmacology continues evolving. While scientific research has validated pharmacological activity and clinical effects, many questions remain about optimal preparation methods, appropriate dosing, patient selection, and integration with conventional treatments. The peony’s medicinal journey spans millennia from ancient empirical observation to contemporary molecular pharmacology, exemplifying the complex relationship between traditional and modern medicine.

Contemporary Breeding and Future Directions

Molecular Breeding and Genetic Engineering

The 21st century has introduced technologies potentially revolutionizing peony breeding. Genetic mapping projects are identifying specific genes controlling flower color, form, fragrance, disease resistance, and other traits. Once mapped, molecular markers allow breeders to identify desirable gene combinations in seedlings before flowering, dramatically accelerating selection.

CRISPR gene editing technology, which allows precise modification of specific DNA sequences, offers possibilities for targeted trait modification. Researchers have proposed using CRISPR to introduce yellow pigment biosynthesis pathways into herbaceous peonies (which lack genes for yellow coloration) or to modify flower form genes creating novel petal arrangements. However, regulatory frameworks for gene-edited ornamental plants remain uncertain in many jurisdictions, and public acceptance of such modifications varies culturally.

Tissue culture techniques allow mass propagation of superior cultivars, potentially reducing peony prices by eliminating slow traditional propagation methods (division for herbaceous peonies, grafting for tree peonies). However, some cultivars resist tissue culture, and concerns about genetic stability during culture limit applications. Nevertheless, commercial tissue culture facilities now produce thousands of plants annually, particularly for intersectional hybrids that command high prices.

Climate Adaptation and Range Expansion

Climate change presents both challenges and opportunities for peony cultivation. Many herbaceous peonies require extended winter cold (vernalization) to flower properly, potentially limiting cultivation in warming climates. Conversely, some regions previously too cold for reliable tree peony cultivation may become suitable as temperatures moderate.

Breeders are pursuing selections adapted to warmer climates with minimal winter chill. Some species, including certain P. lactiflora forms from southern China and Mediterranean species like P. mascula, tolerate milder winters. Incorporating these genetics into garden hybrids could expand cultivation into subtropical regions previously unsuitable.

Drought tolerance represents another breeding priority as water availability decreases in many regions. While peonies generally require adequate moisture, some species (particularly Mediterranean types and certain tree peonies) tolerate drier conditions. Breeding programs are evaluating drought tolerance in controlled trials, selecting genotypes maintaining performance under reduced irrigation.

Heat tolerance breeding addresses humid subtropical climates where high temperatures combine with humidity creating disease pressure. Some intersectional hybrids demonstrate better heat tolerance than either parent species, suggesting that hybrid vigor can address environmental challenges. Southern U.S. gardeners report improved success with newer varieties bred with regional adaptation in mind.

Disease and Pest Resistance

Peonies generally exhibit good disease resistance compared to many ornamental plants, but problems occur. Botrytis blight (Botrytis paeoniae), a fungal disease causing stem rot and flower blight, damages peonies worldwide, particularly during cool, wet spring weather. While fungicides provide control, breeding for genetic resistance would reduce environmental impacts.

Some breeding lines show heritable differences in botrytis susceptibility, suggesting genetic resistance exists within Paeonia. Systematic evaluation of thousands of seedlings under high disease pressure could identify resistant individuals for use as breeding parents. Marker-assisted selection might eventually allow identifying resistance genes in seedlings before exposure to disease.

Other diseases include phytophthora blight (causing root and crown rot), powdery mildew (generally cosmetic rather than life-threatening), and various viral diseases (transmitted by aphids or through vegetative propagation). Breeding programs that routinely test for disease resistance while evaluating aesthetic qualities would gradually improve genetic resistance across all peony classes.

Nematode resistance represents a concern in some regions. Root-knot nematodes and other species can damage peony roots, reducing plant vigor and bloom. Some evidence suggests species-level differences in nematode susceptibility, with tree peonies potentially more tolerant than herbaceous types. Grafting herbaceous peonies onto tree peony rootstocks (the reverse of the traditional tree-peony-on-herbaceous-root graft) might convey nematode resistance.

Novel Forms and Colors

Despite centuries of selection, opportunities for novel peony forms continue emerging. Breeders are pursuing:

True blue flowers: While purple peonies exist, true blue (derived from delphinidin pigments at alkaline pH) remains elusive. Understanding the biochemistry of blue flower color in other genera (delphiniums, morning glories) might guide efforts to create blue peonies through either traditional breeding or genetic engineering.

Black flowers: The darkest modern cultivars approach black but retain purple tones visible in full sun. Achieving true black requires extraordinarily high anthocyanin concentrations plus suppression of competing pigments. Chinese breeders have made progress, but perfectly black peonies remain aspirational.

Green flowers: Some double peonies exhibit green-tinted outer petals representing modified sepals, but flowers with intentional green coloration throughout don’t exist. Since green pigmentation in flowers (chlorophyll) typically indicates incomplete flower development, creating green peonies presents conceptual challenges beyond simple pigment manipulation.

Bi-color and striped patterns: While some cultivars exhibit multiple colors, controlled stripe patterns (like those in certain irises or tulips) remain undeveloped in peonies. The genetic mechanisms producing stable color patterns require understanding and potentially decades of breeding work to achieve.

Novel forms: Beyond traditional single, double, and Japanese forms, breeders are exploring mutations producing unusual petal arrangements. Varieties with split petals, ruffled edges, recurved petals, or other modifications occasionally appear in seedling populations. Stabilizing these traits requires multiple generations of selection.

Extended bloom time: Individual peony flowers typically last several days, with plant bloom periods spanning 1-2 weeks. Breeding for longer-lasting individual flowers or sequential bloom (different stems flowering over extended periods) would increase garden value. Some evidence suggests genetic variation for these traits exists within breeding populations.

Fragrance in tree peonies: While herbaceous peonies often possess strong fragrance, tree peonies generally lack scent. Intersectional hybrids occasionally inherit fragrance from herbaceous parents, demonstrating that transferring this trait is possible. Breeding programs specifically pursuing fragrant tree peonies might achieve this goal within several generations.

Florist viewpoint: The Ongoing Journey

The peony’s journey from wild mountain species to sophisticated garden hybrids spans millennia of human-plant interaction. Ancient Chinese gardeners, medieval European herbalists, Victorian plant hunters, and modern molecular geneticists have each contributed to understanding and developing these remarkable plants.

Contemporary peonies represent the cumulative efforts of countless individuals across cultures and centuries: Chinese farmers who first recognized beautiful flowers among wild plants and brought them into cultivation; imperial patrons who sponsored breeding programs producing hundreds of varieties; plant explorers who risked hardship and disease to collect seeds from remote mountain slopes; scientific breeders who maintained detailed records of crosses and evaluated thousands of seedlings; and modern researchers applying molecular tools to accelerate progress.

The peony embodies successful domestication—wild species transformed through selection into plants serving human aesthetic, medical, and cultural purposes while retaining essential connections to wild ancestors. Unlike some heavily bred ornamentals that bear little resemblance to wild progenitors, peonies maintain the robust constitution and fundamental beauty of their mountain-dwelling ancestors.

Future peony development will likely combine traditional breeding wisdom with modern technologies. Understanding the genetic basis for flower color, form, and fragrance will accelerate progress toward breeding goals while maintaining the aesthetic qualities that have captivated human attention for thousands of years. Conservation of wild populations will preserve genetic diversity and evolutionary potential, ensuring that future breeders can access the same rich genetic resources that enabled historical achievements.

The peony’s enduring appeal reflects qualities transcending any single culture or era: substantial flowers combining architectural form with delicate coloring; reliable performance providing annual displays with minimal maintenance; longevity allowing plants to outlive their planters, connecting generations through shared garden heritage. These attributes, combined with continuing development of novel varieties, ensure that peonies will remain among humanity’s most treasured flowers for centuries to come.

The botanical discovery of peonies, far from complete, continues as researchers explore wild populations, analyze genetic relationships, and create hybrids incorporating previously untapped diversity. Each spring, as millions of peony flowers open in gardens worldwide, they represent not merely individual plants but a living history of human botanical achievement spanning from ancient Chinese imperial gardens to contemporary suburban landscapes—a testament to the enduring partnership between humans and the plants we cultivate.

http://www.peninsulaflower.com/